An Evolving Dynamic with Renewable Energy
Daylight saving time (DST) has long been a topic of debate, particularly in the context of energy usage and market flexibility. As the clocks went back last weekend, marking the end of British Summer Time, it is an opportune moment to examine how this practice interacts with the UK’s energy landscape, especially with the increasing reliance on renewable energy and the reduction of dispatchable generation.
Energy Usage and Daylight-Saving Time
The primary rationale behind DST has always been to make better use of daylight during the evenings, thereby potentially reducing the need for artificial lighting and heating. However, with changes in energy production and consumption patterns, the effectiveness of DST in saving energy has come under scrutiny.
Studies have shown that while DST can lead to reduced lighting needs, it may also result in increased heating demand during the mornings and higher electricity consumption for cooling in the warmer months. In the UK, where winters are relatively mild, but daylight hours can be significantly shorter, the net impact of DST on energy savings is complex. A change to DST may result in energy savings, but this is not the only consideration (e.g. road safety, well-being and public sentiment, to name a few).
Flexibility Markets and Renewable Energy
The UK’s energy market is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by the increasing penetration of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. Unlike traditional power plants, renewable energy generation is intermittent and less predictable, necessitating flexible market mechanisms to balance supply and demand.
Flexibility markets, which allow for real-time adjustments to energy consumption and production, have become crucial in this context. By enabling demand response and the integration of distributed energy resources, these markets can help to stabilise the grid and ensure a reliable supply of electricity. However, the seasonal changes brought about by DST can add another layer of complexity to this balancing act.
Shorter winter daylight hours affect solar energy generation, increasing reliance on other energy sources. Switching to GMT+2 could better align the less abundant solar generation with winter peak demand.
Another consideration is that synchronising UK clocks with European time could raise peak-time prices by aligning demand peaks, whereas differing peak times allow for interconnector arbitrage between markets, reducing peak prices.
Switching between summer and winter clocks creates a 25-hour day in October and a 23-hour day in March. These irregular days complicate IT systems used to manage energy data. Keeping the same time year-round would simplify these systems significantly.
Government Attitudes and Potential Changes
The UK government has periodically reviewed the merits of DST, considering its impact on energy usage, public health, and economic activities. While there has been no definitive move to abolish or modify the practice, there is an ongoing debate about whether the current system remains beneficial in the modern energy landscape. A 1970s trial of GMT+1 year-round showed no clear benefits or drawbacks, but that was a different era when coal use was widespread.
Some countries have already taken steps in this direction. For example, the European Parliament voted in 2019 to end biannual clock changes by 2021, allowing each member state to choose either permanent summer or winter time. However, this change has been delayed, indicating minimal demand for its implementation, regardless of potential energy savings.
In the context of the UK’s energy policy, the government’s stance on DST is likely to be influenced by broader considerations than just energy saving, grid stability and renewable integration. As the country continues to decarbonise its energy system, the interplay between DST and energy usage will remain an interesting topic for policymakers and stakeholders.
The interaction between daylight saving time, energy usage, and flexibility markets in the UK is a multifaceted issue, shaped by evolving consumption patterns and the increasing role of renewable energy. As the country navigates the transition to a more sustainable and resilient energy system, the implications of DST will continue to be a subject of debate and analysis.
While there is no immediate indication that the UK will follow the lead of the European Union in attempting to abolish DST, the discussion highlights the need for adaptable and forward-thinking energy policies. By embracing flexibility markets and innovative solutions, the UK can better manage the seasonal variations in energy demand and ensure a reliable and efficient power system for the future.
Engage Consulting are subject matter experts in the energy sector. Our industry specialist advisory and project management services enable our customers to deliver the changes they need to in order to meet their policy or commercial ambitions, within a complex and evolving energy landscape that is focused on delivering Net Zero & affordable energy to consumers.
